It is true that the more tech savvy you are, the more you stand the risk of being robbed of your Â credentials.One of the biggest concerns for tech users today is their dataâ€”what is collected, how it is used, and who it is shared with. To address this concern, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) recently published itsÂ Who Has Your Back?The report, ranking tech companies on their willingness to share user data with the US government.
The EFF ranked the companies on a star-based system, awarding them a star for each of the categories measured. In the report, companies were ranked on whether they did the following:
- Followed industry-wide best practices
- Told users about government data requests
- Promised not to sell out users
- Stood up to national security letter (NSL) gag orders
- Supported the reform of Section 702 to reduce data collection.
All of the companies studied followed industry best practices. However, listedÂ below are few of the companies which received a star in every category
- Adobe Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
Many other companies fared much worse. Here are the six lowest performing companies on the EFF list:
AT&T follows best practices well by publishing a transparency report and guidelines for government requests, and by requiring warrants for content, the report said. But, that’s the only star it received. In the report, the EFF urged AT&T to make strides in the other measures areas as well.
Telecommunication giant also only got one star from the EFF, also for following best practices. The company has not called for reform to Section 702 and hasn’t promised not to sell out users, nor does it stand up to gag orders or let users know when the government is requesting data.
Although Jeff Bezos rallied on top of the rich list for few hours , Amazon has been on the EFF report for the past six years, but the firm only received two stars in 2017â€”one for following best practices and the other for supporting the reform of Section 702. Amazon still hasn’t clearly stated its policies regarding how third-parties access users data, nor has it explicitly forbidden them from using the data for surveillance, the report said.
In its second year on the list, WhatsApp also earned the same two stars as Amazonâ€”for both supporting Section 702 reform and following best practices. The company has stated that it does share information with “third-party providers,” but requires them to use it “in accordance with our instructions and terms or with express permission from you.”
Also See:Â Identity theft protection policy templateÂ (Tech Pro Research)